RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) Code 4I which denotes Serving on Control
Roster be changed to 3K which denotes Reserved for use by HQ
AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code
applies or 3B which denotes 1st or 2nd term or career airman
ineligible to reenlist.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served his country honorably and with distinction. He never
received an Article 15 or courts-martial. He was singled out
and given an RE code of 4I because he participated in an
investigation against his squadron commander.
His new commander resented him and he was scheduled for
discharge. He decided not to fight the retaliation.
He struggled with his weight towards the end of his career. In
1986, he was diagnosed with diabetes and his weight problem was
a direct result of insulin sensitivity.
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to
consider his untimely application as he learned that the 4I RE
code has prevented him from being considered for many government
jobs despite his qualifications or education level. He would
like to serve in the Ohio Military Reserve but has been refused
entrance because of the 4I RE code.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 4 Oct 72, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 20 Nov 82, he was notified by his commander that he was
ineligible to reenlist due to serving on the Control Roster
(CR). He was informed that unless the condition that rendered
him ineligible to reenlist was removed or he was reconsidered
for reenlistment In Accordance With (IAW) AFR 35-16,
Administrative Separation of Airmen, he would be required to
separate on his date of separation.
On 22 Nov 82, the applicant acknowledged the notification of
reenlistment ineligibility.
On 8 Dec 82, he was honorably discharged with a narrative reason
for separation of Expiration of term of service and RE code
4I.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, paragraph 5.20.1, lists
the hierarchy of RE codes (from bad to good) as 2#, 4#, 3# and
1#.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request for a
more favorable RE code. DPSOR will publish and provide the
applicant with a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 to reflect a
RE code of 2X which denotes First-term airman considered but
not selected under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)
unless otherwise directed by the Board.
Although CR paperwork is not kept in the personnel record, there
is evidence that supports the applicant being on the CR as he
was recommended for demotion for failing the weight program per
the USAF Medical Center/SGQ memorandum dated 2 Dec 82. He was
not demoted and was allowed to separate at his current grade of
Staff Sergeant (SSgt, E-5) on 8 Dec 82. The applicant was non-
selected for reenlistment by his commander per a 20 Nov
82 notification memorandum and his RE code should have been
changed to 2X at the time of non-selection.
A complete copy of the DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He requests the Board consider his request for change of his RE
code to 3K. He served his country honorably and with
distinction. He is now 60 years of age and will never have the
chance to re-enter military service but wants to have the
opportunity to serve his country in some capacity.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. Having
carefully reviewed this application, we find no evidence of an
error or injustice to warrant changing his RE code. We note the
Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends changing
the applicants RE code to 2X; however, based on the hierarchy
of RE codes noted above, we believe changing the record in this
manner would further disadvantage the applicant. Therefore, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03526 in Executive Session on 14 Apr 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Aug 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Nov 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 14.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, 5 Jan 15, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed. On 18 Apr 07, he was honorably discharged from active duty with an RE code of 4I and narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service. He...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03383
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03383 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed in a manner to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00382
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous RE code of 4I. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03900
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program with an honorable character of service and an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...